Characteristics of a Good Editor

Characteristics of a Good Editor You dont have to work for a magazine or newspaper to benefit from the help of a good editor. Even if she seems nit-picky with her line edits, remember that the editor is on your side. A good editor addresses your writing style and creative content, among many other details. Editing styles will vary, so find an editor that gives you the safe space to be creative and make mistakes simultaneously.   The Editor and the Writer Carl Sessions Stepp, the author of Editing for Todays Newsroom, believes editors should practice restraint and refrain from immediately reshaping the content in their own images. He has advised editors to read an article all the way through, open your mind to the logic of the [writers] approach, and offer at least minimal courtesy to the professional who has dripped blood for it.   Jill Geisler of The Poynter Institute says a writer must be able to trust that an editor respects the writers ownership of a story and can resist the temptation to completely write a new and improved version. Says Geisler, Thats fixing, not coaching. ... When you fix stories by doing instant rewrites, there may be a thrill in showing off your skill. By coaching writers, you discover better ways to craft copy. Gardner Botsford of The New Yorker magazine says that a good editor is a mechanic, or craftsman, while a good writer is an artist, adding that that the less competent the writer, the louder the protests over editing. Editor As Critical Thinker Editor-in-chief Mariette DiChristina says editors must be organized, able to see the structure where it does not exist and able to identify the missing pieces or gaps in logic that bring the writing together. [M]ore than being good writers, editors must be good critical thinkers who can recognize and evaluate good writing [or who] can figure out how to make the most of the not-so-good writing. ... [A] good editor needs a sharp eye for detail, writes DiChristina.   A Quiet Conscience The legendary, shy, strong-willed editor of The New Yorker, William Shawn, wrote that it is one of the comic burdens of [an] editor not to be able to explain to anyone else exactly what he does. An editor, writes Shawn, must only counsel when the writer requests it, acting on occasion as a conscience and helping the writer in any way possible to say what he wants to say. Shawn writes that the work of a good editor, like the work of a good teacher, does not reveal itself directly; it is reflected in the accomplishments of others. A Goal-Setter Writer and editor Evelynne Kramer say the best editor is patient and always keeps in mind the long-term goals with the writer and not just what they see on the screen. Says Kramer, We can all get better at what we do, but improvement sometimes takes a lot of time and, more often than not, in fits and starts. A Partner Editor-in-chief Sally Lee says the ideal editor brings out the best in a writer and allows a writers  voice  to shine through. A good editor makes a writer feel challenged, enthusiastic and valuable. An editor is only as good as her writers, says Lee. An Enemy of Cliches Media columnist and reporter David Carr said the best editors  are the enemies  of clichà ©s and tropes, but not the overburdened writer who occasionally resorts to them. Carr stated that the perfect traits of a good editor are good judgment, an appropriate bedside manner and an ability to conjure occasional magic in the space between writer and editor.

Abortions Should be banned Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Abortions Should be banned - Term Paper Example Basically, abortion refers to the process of terminating pregnancy as a result of various reasons (Wharton, 1989). Abortion in medical science is a process in which doctors, with the approval of the pregnant women, kill the foetus in order to terminate the pregnancy. â€Å"Abortion is the intentional termination of a pregnancy after conception† (Head, n.d.). However, the concept of abortion varies from country to country and it is seen as controversial in that some countries have legalized it while others prohibit it. The controversy about this topic mainly emanates from the fact that abortion is considered to be a moral issue which is often viewed as wrong by different people from different parts of the globe. In some countries, abortion is illegal while it is recognised in certain countries. Thus, the most controversial issue in abortion is determination of whether the fetus is a person or not. Supporters of abortion believe that a foetus is not a person and a woman has full right on her body whereas opponents of abortion believe that fetus or embryo has life in it and killing a fetus is same like killing a human. Against this backdrop, I am anti abortion since I view it as immoral given that it involves termination of life which is wrong. Gerrard (2009) states that, â€Å"Abortion is one of the most divisive topics in healthcare.† Abortion is not considered good in most parts of the world because of different religious and social pressures. Kelley (2010) asserts posits to the effect that, â€Å"Within the Roman Catholic Church, teachings and leaders commonly oppose abortion.† Also in Islamic countries, abortion seems to have no place. For instance, in Iran as well as other developing countries, intentional abortion except for some special cases is regarded as illegal as a result of social and religious beliefs (Shahbazi, 2011). There are various ethical issues associated with the act of abortion, which prevent a woman from ending her